Political Economy

The Looming Extinction of the Working Class

August 29, 2022

Joel Kotkin

Washington Fellow

Provocations #3

Click here to view a PDF version. The Provocations series is available in hard copy and e-book formats on Amazon.

Summary: An entrenched oligarchic class increasingly controls politics, the media, and big business in America. This oligarchy’s interests and actions are more and more opposed to the prosperity of the working and middle classes: this oligarchy is making them poorer, weaker, and their lives less stable. And it is aligned with America’s political class, which refuses to see that American democracy will collapse without a healthy working and middle class. America will not survive this emerging neo-feudal economic order of limited mobility and sky-high inequality.


“No bourgeois, no democracy” —Barrington Moore

You can’t have a democracy—at least outside of a one-party “people’s” version—without a middle class. Much of the last half millennia is the story of the bumpy rise of an expanding middle class, which successfully replaced ancient aristocratic structures, creating a remarkably innovative economic culture and a vital democratic society. But over the last four decades, this class—which includes artisans, small businesspeople, and skilled workers—has been declining, largely as the result of economic forces but also because of political decisions to adopt policies inimical to those groups’ needs.

One sees this process unfolding in the wealth gap between the global rich and the middle class: it has grown to levels not seen since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.1 In many countries, the income gap between the top 1 percent of the population and the remaining 99 percent is at an all-time high.2 This reality has been particularly marked in the United States. As one conservative economist put it succinctly in 2018, “The economic legacy of the last decade is excessive corporate consolidation, a mas­sive transfer of wealth to the top 1 percent from the middle class.”3 In the United States, an affluent class of roughly 1.35 million—the top 1 percent—is doing fine, but wealth gains have been especially concentrated among the top 0.1 percent, roughly one hundred and fifty thousand people.4 Since the mid-1980s, the share of national wealth held by those below the top 10 percent has fallen by twelve percentage points, the same proportion that the top 0.1 percent gained.5

Unless there are significant changes, the modern-day equivalent of the medieval aristocracy seems likely to grow. A recent British parliamentary study projects that by 2030, the top 1 percent will expand their share to two-thirds of the world’s wealth, with the biggest gains overwhelmingly concentrated at the top 0.01 percent.6

The key here is not a disproportion of wealth as a singular moral issue. It is not simply that some people are now wealthier than ever. Rather, it is that the wealthy are not only considerably more wealthy and more powerful, andthat even (historically) comfortable and independent groups—the middle class and the upper end of the working classes—are being undermined and turned into serf-like dependents.

If these trends hold, we may witness the middle class and the aspirational working class being overwhelmed by the rise of a ruling coalition of oligarchs and a modern clerisy, with implications well beyond economic considerations. The rise of the middle class rested on a value structure built around religious faith, family, the rule of law, and respect for property rights. As this middle class, the yeomanry, fades, along with its value structure, we seem to be heading to an era of autocracy, intolerance, stagnation and control—a reversion, in some ways, to a new kind of feudalism.

Property Dispersion and Democracy

The rise of the middle class tracks the emergence of capitalism in early modern Europe. With the collapse of the western Roman Empire in the fifth century AD, there was no state capable of sustaining a sophisticated economy, and society shifted to a hierarchical and largely agrarian feudalism. Most people were illiterate serfs, laboring in fields did not own. The idea of self-government for the masses would have seemed absurd, even sacrilegious, and was barely even considered.7 As historian Pierre Riche noted, the prevailing model of society consisted of three kinds of people: “those who prayed, those who fought and those who labored.”8

The revival of commerce during the Italian Renaissance saw the emergence of a middle class that sought and sometimes even achieved considerable say in government affairs.9 By the thirteenth century, serfdom was waning in much of Western Europe. Though some manumitted serfs suffered from the loss of basic protections afforded in the feudal system, others were able to acquire land for their own farms or start enterprises in the reinvigorated cities.10 Across Europe, the old medieval order was undermined by a diminishing threat of invasion, more efficient agricultural practices, a demographic rebound, and the revival of commerce and urban culture, particularly around the Mediterranean and the Baltic.11

But it was in the Netherlands where the bourgeois class flourished most. At a time when property ownership was limited to a few, Netherlanders expanded their territory by draining swamps and building dikes, establishing new farms and businesses. Improvements in agricultural methods led to an early commercialization of the countryside and fueled a wider economic boom. As the economic historian Jan de Vries observed, “capitalism grew out of the soil in Holland.”12

After expelling their Spanish Habsburg rulers in the seventeenth century, the Dutch built the world’s most powerful maritime empire, with a fleet larger than all the rest of Europe’s combined. Amsterdam’s large port bustled with a rich trade in foodstuffs, hemp, hops, and dye plants. The opportunistic Dutch expanded their commercial activity in part by pioneering technological changes decades ahead of their competitors.13

But arguably their greatest achievement lay in creating a republic free from aristocratic or clerical domination.14 The growing ranks of proprietors set down “the geographical roots of republican liberty,” notes historian Simon Schama.15 Dutch culture was family-centered, inventive, sober, frugal, and tolerant.16 Although it was majority Calvinist, the country boasted large colonies of Catholics, Jews, and other outsiders, including Muslims; indeed, roughly one-third of Amsterdam’s population in 1650 was foreign-born, though European. Acquiring citizenship was difficult for this group of people, although it could be granted as a gift or through marriage. But even if not these outsiders were not citizens, life was better for them. Some immigrants came as merchants or artisans, but even the poorest, observed one Dutchman in 1692, “cannot die of hunger if he works hard.”17

The Epoch of the Middle Class

The rise of the Netherlands was just one part of the middle class’s modern emergence. Medieval economies depended on rentiers and inheritors, but changing conditions elevated the innovative, aggressive, and risk-taking entrepreneurs. New technology, expanding trade, and institutions of self-government transformed feudal society.18 The entrepreneurs who chipped away at the feudal order did not generally come from the nobility, who in some cases were prohibited or socially discouraged from engaging in commerce.19 Aristocratic elites sometimes gave valuable funding and sponsorship to entrepreneurs, many of whom were from groups that had long been persecuted, groups that included itinerant workers and dissenting Protestants, as well as Jews.20

To a great degree, these commercial risk takers initiated our modern world, pacing the remarkable rise of Europe over older, and traditionally wealthier, civilizations in Asia and the Middle East.21 The rise in economic growth recast expectations for what the common person could attain in life on earth, something rare in feudal times.22 For many centuries, or even millennia—despite advances in agriculture and the growth of commerce—average incomes remained nearly the same and material conditions changed little. It was only during the seventeenth century that sustained economic growth appeared to be possible, at which point average incomes began to rise dramatically, beginning in Britain and the Netherlands.23

The Rise of Individualism and Property Rights

The yeomanry’s rise rested on a specific set of values about family, religion, respect for privacy, and enterprise. This was not merely a conservative position but one also adopted by reformers and social democrats, not only in the United States but in Europe, particularly Sweden. The ideal was to create an economic order where one income-earner could support a household without requiring massive financial assistance from the state.24The key here is not so much how societies preserve the middle orders, but that they represent the essence of democracy in an economic sense in ways that the Clerisy and aristocrats never could.

At the root of this change was a shift from aristocratic and ecclesiastical domination of landownership to a more “individualistic” concept of property rights.25 A substantial class of independent smallholders demanded a constitutional order that would protect their holdings.26 Artisans and merchants had laid the groundwork for self-governance within their guilds and in some places seized power from the aristocracy and even the clergy. As the radical social theorist Barrington Moore said a half century ago, “no bourgeois, no democracy.”27 Or, to alter Aristotle a little, no middle class, no political liberty.28

As students of classical history, the founders of the American republic believed the dispersion of property was critical to democracy. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and John Adams all considered the overconcentration of property in few hands a basic threat to republican institutions, a view also embraced by thinkers like Edmund Burke, Alexis de Tocqueville, and Adam Smith.29 When the Industrial Revolution was proceeding apace, Karl Marx declared the rising bourgeoisie to be “the first to show what man’s activity can bring about” by exchanging the veneer of religiosity and chivalry with “naked, shameless, direct brutal exploitation.”30 But capitalism did not produce the dystopia that Marx predicted; instead it lifted up a large portion of the masses and created a solid middle class (a designation first used in Britain in 1812).31

Never before had so much prosperity and relative economic security been so widely enjoyed.32 Between 1940 and 1950, the incomes of the bottom 40 percent of American workers surged by roughly 40 percent, while the gains in the top quintile were a modest 8 percent and the top 5 percent saw their incomes drop slightly.33 Between 2005 and 2014, the percentage of families with flat or decreasing real incomes rose to over 60 percent in the twenty-five most advanced economies.

Of course, Western progress did not guarantee rights to all—far from it—within their societies and particularly outside of them. The wealth that lifted up the Dutch and British middle classes rested in part on the exploitation of indigenous peoples.34 Elements of American success were built in part on the destruction of indigenous cultures and the abhorrent practice of slavery. But democratic countries were not unique in this. The Russians, the Ch’ing Chinese, and the Japanese were also colonial expansionists whose rule was generally far from gentle.35 And, unlike middle-class democracy, authoritarian imperialism generally failed to generate long-term, broad-based growth.

In the past fifty years, entrepreneur-led, democratic capitalism brought widely shared prosperity to a large part of the world. Many places once colonized by Western nations have been among the prime beneficiaries. In Singapore, Malaysia, and India, as well as Oceania – all once under British tutelage—the rule of law remains in force and democratic structures remain more or less intact. Countries shaped by the United States, such as Japan, as well as South Korea, and Taiwan, all saw rapid economic growth and, as their populations became more educated and politically aware, evolved into vital democracies. The key here may well be in the strong ties to the West, and particularly America. The United States essentially pushed the development of capitalism and, over time, encouraged democracy as well. Of course, countries can participate in the capitalist system to get rich without self-government, and without being dominated by the West politically: countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates have managed to become rich without recourse to rule of law or civil rights, often via the exploitation of abundant natural resources.

Why the Middle Class Declined

These remarkable achievements of liberal capitalism are now distinctly threatened. This is likely not a “conspiracy” but the collective result of private actions driven by rational decision-making.

Until the 1990s, fields that were growing and promised higher profits invited newcomers, as one would expect.36 Since then, there has been a marked decrease in the percentage of all small firms in both the United States and Europe as larger firms continue to increase their share of the pie.37 Technology has played a critical role by facilitating global commerce and, increasingly, driving business from the Main Streets and local companies to massive firms with the ability to adjust to changing conditions.38

This was particularly evident during the pandemic—made worse by the response to Covid and the Russo-Ukrainian War—stoking inflation to the highest level in forty years.39 Roughly one hundred and ten thousand restaurants have shut down during the lockdowns, and some two hundred thousand more businesses overall have simply shut down.40 It is no surprise that barely 16 percent of small business owners, according to one recent survey, think the federal government is performing well for them.41 As executive compensation reached the stratosphere at the big tech and finance firms, the Harvard Business Review notes that small businesses—the bulwark of the yeoman class—face “an existential threat” to their existence.42 The pandemic shift clearly favored big companies, who could deploy far greater resources make the necessary transition to the new reality. Big Pharma companies have reined in lucrative profits with vaccine revenue.43 CEO compensation reached record levels this year; investment bankers on Wall Street enjoyed record bonuses; and the giant tech firms now boast a market capitalization greater than the bloated federal budget.44 The biggest tech firms achieved new record valuations and ever-increasing domination. As millions struggle to fill their gas tanks and pay their rent, sales of business jets to the rising ranks of billionaires have soared to new heights.45

Upward mobility, the engine of democratic capitalism, has also faded across the world, even in East Asia, which had enjoyed the most dramatic growth in prosperity of any region in the world.46 China’s Gini index—a measure of inequality—has gone from highly egalitarian in 1978 to more stratified than Mexico, Brazil, or Kenya. The income of the ultrawealthy expanded by more than twice the national average rate.47 Middle-class Chinese people now find it difficult to buy property or get ahead. In avowedly socialist China, the top 1 percent of the population holds about one-third of the country’s wealth, and roughly 1,300 individuals hold about 20 percent.48

This crushing of the middle orders is also taking place in sub-Saharan Africa and Russia, as well as in Latin America and India.49 Even with their robust social welfare provisions, over two-thirds of European Union countries, including Sweden, have seen social mobility decline in recent decades.50 Germany is significantly less equal than its EU peers, with richer households controlling a bigger share of assets than in most other Western European states. The bottom 40 percent of German adults hold almost no assets at all; barely 45 percent own homes.51 In Great Britain, a decline in the numbers of middle-income jobs has depressed wages and, more broadly, brought a halt to social mobility.52 “We are facing a new set of problems,” said Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the once powerful Trades Union Congress. “We have people with degrees doing Mickey Mouse jobs and young people who will have no occupational pension and no house to sell to see them through old age.”53

This trend is also occurring in the United States, the historic heartland of middle-class aspiration. According to one study, the chances of middle-class earners moving up to the top rungs of the income ladder has declined by approximately 20 percent since the early 1980s.54 Data from the census bureau show that the share of national income going to the middle 60 percent of households has fallen to a record low.55 Wealth gains in recent decades have gone overwhelmingly to the top 1 percent of households, and especially the top 0.5 percent, as wage and salary income, starting in the early 1970s, have dropped as a percentage of wealth.56

Banking and finance, treated amiably by Washington during the financial crisis, have become increasingly concentrated, while many smaller regional institutions have either been acquired or driven out of business.57 Growing corporate concentration has now seeped into the once dynamic tech economy in both the United States and Europe.58 In Silicon Valley now, the renowned garage culture has morphed into a Gargantua of giant firms with market power unprecedented in modern times, controlling in some cases 80 to 90 percent of their markets.59

Similarly, property ownership has become more concentrated across the Western world. We see declining homeownership, particularly among the young, notably in the United States, Canada, and Australia.60 In Great Britain, where land prices have risen dramatically over the past decade, less than one percent of the population owns half of all the land. Overall, on the Continent, farmland increasingly is concentrated while urban real estate inexorably flows into the hands of a small cadre of corporate owners and the megawealthy.61 Even in the United States, a country that never experienced feudalism, property ownership now increasingly depends on inheritance; the offspring of property-owning parents are far better situated to own a house eventually (often with parental help) and enter what one writer calls “the funnel of privilege.”62 In America, millennials are three times as likely as boomers to count on inheritance for their retirement. Among the youngest cohort, those ages —eighteen to twenty-two, over 60 percent see inheritance as their primary source of sustenance as they age.63

The coming years will likely see further consolidation of wealth and property ownership, with a continued shift to large chains and online platforms like Amazon, which now uses its power to coerce small businesses to give up their data. At the same time, many small landlords, reeling from rent holidays, seem destined to follow suit. Enjoying record profits, some large banks, like England’s Lloyd’s Bank, are now in an ideal position to gobble up and dominate the emerging market in distressed properties, apartments, and even single-family homes.

This trend to buy up single family homes, further raising their cost, and then rent them out, particularly to priced-out millennials, has reached record proportions.64 Rather than help middle-class families, this approach supports the rentier class—which Piketty calls the “enemy of democracy”—assuring them of steady profits by collecting rents while the middle class loses its independence.65 One analyst predicted that most middle-class people will soon be “priced out” of ownership in a “rentership society” where Wall Street firms turn homes, furniture, and other necessities into rental products.66

The Clerisy and the Emerging Class Order

Many of these forces have been taking place, as it were, naturally, forming what appears to be a natural, if somewhat unfortunate, evolution of monopoly capitalism in ways that many—Marx, Schumpeter, and even Adam Smith—would recognize. But the assault on the economic foundation of the middle class also diminishes its influence on political policy.

In this the oligarchs are certainly players, ever-increasing in political influence and contributions.67 But their agenda regarding issues like climate, in which they generally in agreement with the Left, and antitrust, in which they are generally in agreement with the Right, needs its champions outside their own ranks. They need to have their hegemony justified by either the appearance of virtue or by worship of the market. In this, they recruit both liberals and conservatives, funding their foundations, university centers, and, increasingly, the media.68

The driver in the policy world comes from the Clerisy, a term coined by Samuel Coleridge in the 1830s to refer to a class of people charged, like the medieval clergy, with instructing and directing the masses. Expanding during the Industrial Revolution, the Clerisy gradually replaced the religious clergy as what the great German sociologist Max Weber called society’s “new legitimizers.”69 Together with the oligarchs, the upper echelons of the Clerisy now constitute a new national elite tied together by education, lifestyle, and remarkably similar, party-line, progressive political beliefs.70

In the United States, the Clerisy are concentrated in professions whose numbers have waxed in recent decades, such as teaching, consultancy, law, government bureaucracy, and health care work. In contrast, the traditional middle class–small business owners, workers in basic industries, and construction—have seen their share of the job market decline.71 Some professions once more tied to the private economy, such as doctors, have become subsumed by bureaucratic structures and shifted from having a dependably conservative to an increasingly progressive stance.72

This power rests on the Clerisy’s domination over most of culture, the media, the education systems, and the bureaucracy.73 Many in the elected legislature, notes Harvard University’s Yascha Mounk, share “less and less” in common with their constituents, even as they allow power to drift to the courts, the bureaucracy, the central banks, and nonprofits staffed and controlled by the Clerisy.74

Like the old Catholic first estate, the contemporary Clerisy generally see themselves motivated to work not for self-interest but the good of society. They constitute “the privileged stratum,” in the words of the French leftist author Christophe Guilluy, operating from an assumption of “moral superiority” that justifies their right to instruct others.75 Some work in the public sector, then head to Wall Street or Silicon Valley, returning back to Washington much wealthier for the bother while their families leverage their elite ties.76

Although certainly not unanimous, the Clerisy generally favors ever increased central control and regulation. French economist Thomas Piketty calls them “the Brahmin left,” pointing out that their priority is not greater affluence or democracybut a society shaped by their own largely progressive beliefs; on the so-called Right, on the other hand, similar sorts of people seem motivated by an almost religious faith in the untrammeled rights of big capital and monopolies.77

The potential power of the Clerisy became highly evident during the pandemic. The health emergency required a strong response, but this continued for years and expressed itself largely through executive diktats, both at the national and local level. It has also supercharged the seemingly relentless rise of a centralized administrative state generally. It lay out rules—for example, regarding small business—that clearly benefited larger, better capitalized firms over smaller ones. Executive power may prove difficult to restrain as the pandemic fades. It is likely to be used postpandemic to “fight” climate change by purposely slowing economic growth and repressing opportunities for most middle-class and working-class people.

As in the case of the oligarchs, it is doubtful most members of the dominant, largely progressive Clerisy wish ill to small business or to oppose the middle class. But in practice executive power—not only in America, but also in Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, and much of the European Union—tends to be more sensitive to elite concerns, much as the bishops of the medieval Catholic Church identified, and sought the resources, of the aristocratic class.

How big is the Clerisy? As Michael Lind estimates, the “overclass” is made up of some 15 percent of the American workforce, far larger than the membership of the old first estate, which was closer to 1 percent of the French population. Another estimate describes them more narrowly, with those at the top echelon in law, the best universities, and government composing roughly 2.4 million people out of a country of over 320 million.78

The Clerisy’s War on the Yeomanry

Like the Catholic Church and the medieval aristocracy, the contemporary Clerisy enjoys a symbiotic relationship with the oligarchic elites. These are also the main financiers of the Clerisy and their prime employers within NGOs, the universities, the media, and culture industries. In contrast to the traditional yeomanry, who tend to oppose controls, they are often beneficiaries of the regulatory state, either directly as high-level government employees or as consultants, attorneys, or through nonprofits.79 If the oligarchs destroy the middle class as a function of their business interests, the Clerisy does so intentionally for ideological reasons.

The pandemic has amplified the power of the Clerisy, but we may be seeing just the rosy dawn of their ascendency. The policies impose during Covid—usually without legislative approval—could provide the role model for further intrusions on such things as speech, sex education, what is permissible in terms of addressing people, or whether certain groups should receive special benefits owing to their legacy of persecution.

Although this cultural agenda is offensive to many, it does not constitute the biggest threat to the middle orders. Already the media, the academic and nonprofit interests have started to identify the extreme Covid measures not as a temporary and arguably necessary measures but as a “test run” for how to impose their preferred climate change policies.80 These approaches explicitly oppose upward mobility, thereby hurting the working and middle classes far more than either the professional Clerisy or the oligarchs.81 Yet it would be an exaggeration to imply intent here, when most likely the elites’ priorities are simply the result of their theology and, to some extent, their insulation from the world of analogue commerce, factories, trucking, or farming.

In France and several other countries, climate change-driven policies and higher energy policies already have inspired mass demonstrations by the middle and working class.82 This is not because people want to ruin the planet but because they are less than enthusiastic about losing their jobs or seeing their communities fall into postindustrial malaise.83 In contrast, the superwealthy, such as Jeff Bezos—who in 2020 committed to giving $10 billion to environmental groups—can demand strict policies to curb climate change without jeopardizing their ability to make unprecedented fortunes, shoot themselves into space, maintain mansions in the style of Hapsburg royalty, or fly in private jets even to climate change-related events.84 They also have been prominent in investing in renewable schemes, often subsidized by governments, and are primed to be major beneficiaries of new infrastructure spending.85

The Clerisy hector everyone else, writes the progressive author Anand Giridharadas, but “have continued to hoard the overwhelming share of [economic] progress” while “the average American’s life has scarcely improved.”86 Yet this is not just a case of economic self-interest. Well-educated managers of major companies and the credentialed Clerisy are naturally drawn to the idea of a society ruled by professional experts with “enlightened” values—that is, by people like themselves.87 In contrast, people in occupations like construction, the energy sector, or agriculture tend to favor less intrusive economic and social policies. The Clerisy and their oligarchical allies can gain power and retain their privileges even under draconian climate rules; this is less the case for an oil rigger, a factory employee, or a construction worker who drives an old truck to work.88

Target: The Family and Values

Perhaps the most perfidious Clerisy assault focuses on the value systems that underpinned the rise of the middle class. Many in these elites despise the traditions of country, religion, and family. Their hatred increases the conflict among cultural and racial identities. Once normal bourgeoise success is defined as mere “privilege” for males and whites, the idea of merit and rewards for work are destroyed. But in a racially and ethnically diverse capitalist society, merit is among the very few ideals that can keep such a society together.89

In some senses, liberal capitalism’s success has sown the seeds that could create its destruction.90 Alvin Toffler predicted almost half a century ago that growing affluence would result in replacing the profit motive with more aesthetic goals, a quest for self-fulfillment, or unbridled hedonism. “Affluence serves as a base from which men begin to strive for post-economic goals,” he wrote.91 Another perceptive observer, the sociologist Daniel Bell, identified the rise of an affluent “new class” embracing values profoundly divergent from bourgeois norms of self-control, industriousness, and personal responsibility. Instead, it favored a new type of individualism, unmoored from religion and family, which would dissolve the foundations of middle-class culture.92

In the United States, many people have come to regard children as a luxury, since the costs associated with childrearing, including school and housing, have risen far faster than incomes.93 Worryingly, young Americans place a much lower focus on having children than their parents.94 Many who have children, even the well-educated, do so alone, and single parenthood has grown from 10 percent in 1960 to more than 40 percent today.95 Alvin Toffler envisioned a revolution in marriage that would result in a “streamlined family” relying on professional child raisers. The ideal of long-term marriage would give way, he expected, to more transient relationships and numerous partners at different stages of life.96 But the big shift is toward childlessness. Some progressives suggest that babies are no longer even necessary to keep the country alive, as shortfalls in the workforce can be met by importing masses of immigrants from developing countries.97

But increasingly people choose not to have children. The percentage of American women who are mothers is at its lowest point in over three decades and sexual activity appears to have declined.98 The birthrate is now the lowest in generations, a trend accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic and allegedly reinforced by climate change concerns.99 Postfamilial attitudes are, if anything, even more common in continental Europe.100 By 2000, more than half of births in Sweden were to unmarried women (though most of them cohabiting). The rates in most Western countries are trending the same way.101 In Britain, 8 percent of households in 1970 were headed by a single parent; now the rate is over 25 percent. The number of children born outside marriage has doubled over the past three decades; now 40 percent of British children are born out of wedlock.102

Such attitudes about the family are increasingly common in the media. The rise of bohemianism in the twentieth century emphasized individual empowerment over family obligation and thus elevated the status of single households.103 These views are widely embraced by many feminists, as well as the leaders of Black Lives Matter.104 To even mention that having children may be good for society, as Hillbilly Elegy author J. D. Vance did, was enough to lead the ultrawoke Salon to spot “dog whistles for white nationalism and misogyny.”105

The New Road to Serfdom

As the economy moves toward oligarchy and bourgeois values fall, we are laying the foundation for a shift, particularly in the next generation, toward permanent serfdom. Rather than seeking ways to expand opportunities for ownership, both the planning Clerisy and the oligarchs often sneer at the family-friendly, affordable, suburban housing that has accommodated the middle class over the past half century, claiming such places are intrinsically racist as well as unsustainable.106 Ultimately, the push for forced densification reflects, as architectural historian Robert Bruegmann observes, a “class-based” effort to revive the patterns of the premodern past, with defined hierarchies and limited opportunities for upward mobility outside the upper classes.107

In the past, even working-class people, by pooling resources, were able to buy a house in industrializing America. But the shifts in the economy, particularly during the pandemic, hit hard on poorly paid, and generally younger, service workers, and pushed many toward a more destitute state.108 Rising property prices and low wages threaten to make homeownership more difficult, undermining the best chance for wealth creation for most families.109

The once aspirational yeoman spirit is being replaced by growing dependence on government and a debilitating pattern of de-moralization.110 There is now evidence of deteriorating mental health—roughly one in three working class people admitted to considering suicide. Life expectancy has now dropped more than during any time since the Great Depression, particularly for working-class people and those without college degrees, in part owing to higher levels of drug overdoses.111 Only the best-educated, wealthiest segments now enjoy improved living standards.112

Can the Yeomanry Fight Back?

Politicians and the media obsess over issues like race and gender, but they disdain speaking of the real divide, which is class.113 As stated above, this gap is being caused both by essentially economic and technological forces, but it is exacerbated by policies, such as those having to do with Covid and climate change, imposed by the Clerisy and widely supported by the oligarchs.

To date neither party wants to address the key issues—the concentration of wealth and property, and the impact of government regulation on small businesses—because to do so would interfere with their own political constituencies. For Republicans, the issue remains the sanctity of capital in all cases, which reflects the party’s continued reliance on wealthy donors.114 The Democrats, who rely on the predominant part of that class, may talk about inequality, but under the Clinton and Obama administrations they allowed monopolistic tech firms to merge and buy out competitors with impunity.115

The failure of the Democrats, unlike that of the Republicans, to address class issues reflects the power of the Clerisy as well. Democrats, as Thomas Frank notes in the Guardian, reject the very notion of “populism” and favor a “grand vision of how society should be directed” through the agency of “responsible professionals” like themselves.116 Rather than focus on the daily needs of working people, notes British trade unionist and firefighter Paul Embrey, the tradition left-wing parties, like Labour, have “swallowed a poisonous brew” of “liberal wokedom” that disparages work, the traditional family, and national traditions.117 University of California Professor Joan C. Williams, author of Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America, notes that Democrats “once focused on good jobs for a very broad range of Americans that yielded their version of a solid, middle-class life,” but now, rather than boost the economic basis of social democracy, have “been offering them sympathy and social programs.”118

To survive, the middle class needs to stand up against both parties and to reaffirm again the values that sparked its emergence. It will require a volte face on the prevailing cultural and educational trends, which increasingly advocate malignant racialist doctrines, “social justice,” and equity over competence. Even Big Business needs to realize that these doctrines undermine their own interests; woke education, for example, is not likely to produce the skilled workers they need.119

Most needed, for lack of a better term, is a class consciousness, not in the Marxian sense, but in a demand for policies that promote the middle class along with working-class aspirations to join it. The new middle-class politics needs to be laser-focused on those things that help small property and business owners. These include such things as strong antitrust enforcement, removal of regulations that disproportionately hurt smaller firms, and an industrial strategy that seeks to reshore enterprise and reduce dependence on far-flung supply chains. Education and infrastructure improvements could expand the economy, providing new opportunities for entrepreneurs.120

Whether this can be fit into a conservative worldview is not for me to judge, as I am not a conservative. But it is the only way to slow, and perhaps reverse, the oligarchic and clerical domination of the economy that, if unchecked, opens the door to an increasingly autocratic system. Such a politics could find its home on the Right, where anticorporate sentiment is growing, or on the Left, where economic radicalism has traditionally resided.121

Ultimately, the party or ideologies that address inequality and the squeeze on the middle class will be able to tap into a growing anti-establishment sentiment. Americans, including minorities, are not wedded to laissez faire religion, as was recently made clear by Florida’s endorsement of a $15 an hour wage.122 Yet at the same time, notes one study, barely 8 percent of the population can be considered “woke,” and this small group is mostly white, well-educated, and affluent.123 And less than one in four opt for socialism, according to a December 2020 survey.124 There’s also growing distrust across the political spectrum of Big Tech, massive corporations, the news media, and the federal government.125

This dissatisfaction is disruptive but also healthy. Americans, of all colors, do not want a new feudalism; they still seek the American dream, although they lack conviction they can achieve it. They want something different from the current consolidation of wealth and power, and greater opportunities for their children. The yeomanry may be down, but they are far from being buried permanently in the past. “Happy the nation whose people have not forgotten how to rebel,” wrote the British historian R. H. Tawney.126 What society needs now is not more domination by the oligarchs and their allies in the Clerisy, but a return to middle-class aspiration. A people recovering their hope can be humbled and even made to suffer, but ultimately, won’t likely be defeated or denied.127


[1] Peter Lindert and Jeffrey Williamson, “Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality Since 1700,” Vox, CEPR Policy Portal, June 16, 2016, https://voxeu.org/article/american-growth-and-inequality-1700.

[2] David DeGraw, “We’re Living in a System of New Feudalism. Here’s How to Change It,” New Statesman, October 31, 2013, http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/were-living-system-new-feudalism-heres-how-change-it.

[3] John Michaelson, “America’s Lost Decade,” City Journal, Winter 2018, https://www.city-journal.org/html/america%E2%80%99s-lost-decade-15653.html.

[4] Seth Hanlon and Galen Hendricks, “Addressing Tax System Failing That Favor Billionaires and Corporations,” Center for American Progress, September 3, 2021, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2021/09/03/503398/addressing-tax-system-failings-favor-billionaires-corporations/.

[5] Angela Monaghan, “US Wealth Inequality—Top 0.1% Worth as Much as the Bottom 90%,” Guardian, November 13, 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/13/us-wealth-inequality-top-01-worth-as-much-as-the-bottom-90.

[6] Michael Savage, “Richest 1% on Target to Own Two-Thirds of All Wealth by 2030,” Guardian, April 7, 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/apr/07/global-inequality-tipping-point-2030.

[7] Frances and Joseph Gies, Daily Life in Medieval Times (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969), 24, 26–28; Robert S. Lopez, The Birth of Europe (New York: M. Evans, 1998), 170.

[8] Pierre Riché, Daily Life in the World of Charlemagne, trans. Jo Ann McNamara (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978), 133.

[9] Milad D. Mohammadi, “Corporate Guild Order Control of the Florentine Republic in the 13th and 14th Century,” Brewminate, November 7, 2018, https://brewminate.com/corporate-guild-order-control-of-the-florentine-republic-in-the-13th-and-14th-century/.

[10] Lopez, The Birth of Europe, 171; Marc Bloch, Feudal Society, trans. L. A. Manyon (London: Routledge, 1961), 278; Frances and Joseph Gies, Daily Life in Medieval Times (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969), 148–49; Norman F. Cantor, Medieval History: The Life and Death of a Civilization (New York: Macmillan, 1963), 277; Moore Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 10.

[11] James Westfall Thompson and Edgar Nathaniel Johnson, An Introduction to Medieval Europe (New York: Norton, 1937), 349; Barbara Tuchman, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century (New York: Knopf, 1978), 135.

[12] Fernand Braudel, The Perspective of the World, vol. 3 of Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, trans. Sian Reynolds (New York: Harper & Row, 1984),98, 177–78.

[13] Fernand Braudel, The Perspective of the World, 178–84, 190–91; Jonathan Israel, The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 905.

[14] Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the 16th Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974), 208–9.

[15] Simon Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age (New York: Vintage, 1997), 38–39; Braudel, The Perspective of the World, 177–78, 201; Israel, The Dutch Republic, 106; Andro Linklater, Owning the Earth: The Transforming History of Land Ownership (New York: Bloomsbury USA, 2013), 50.

[16] Philippe Ariès, Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life, trans. Robert Baldrick (New York: Vintage, 1962), 375, 398; Simon Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches, 297; Israel, The Dutch Republic, 41, 80, 787.

[17] Braudel, The Perspective of the World, 186–89; Bernard Lewis, The Muslim Discovery of Europe (New York: Norton, 1982), 11; Joop de Jong, “The Dutch Golden Age and Globalization: History and Heritage, Legacies and Contestations,” Macalester International 27 (December 2011): 46–67.

[18] R. R. Palmer, The World of the French Revolution (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), 268–69; Georges Lefebvre, The Coming of the French Revolution, trans. R. R. Palmer (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 194), 177–81.

[19] Lopez, The Birth of Europe, 21–23.

[20] Reuven Brenner, Rivalry: In Business, Science, Among nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 37–41.

[21] Edward Barbier, Scarcities and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed Through Natural Resource Exploitation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011), 84–91, 158, 176; Jeffrey A. Winters, Oligarchy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 28–29; Bernard Lewis, The Muslim Discovery of Europe, 27.

[22] Richard Reeves, “Capitalism Used to Promise a Better Future: Can It Still Do That?” Guardian, May 22, 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/22/capitalism-broken-better-future-can-it-do-that.

[23] Max Roser, “Economic Growth,” Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth.

[24] Michael Lind, “Home Economics,” American Affairs 4, no. 1 (Fall 2020): 77–83.

[25] Nathan Rosenberg and L.E. Birdzell Jr., How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World (New York: Basic Books, 1986), 24; Edward B. Barbier, Scarcities and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed Through Natural Resource Exploitation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 407, 605.

[26] Thompson and Johnson, An Introduction to Medieval Europe, 328.

[27] Moore Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, 418.

[28] Aristotle, Politics, book 4, chapter 11.

[29] Jeffrey A. Winters, Oligarchy, 28–30.

[30] Karl Marx, Capital, trans. Ben Fowkes (New York: Vintage, 1957), 1:914–15; Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, “The Manifesto of the Communist Party,” in The Essential Left (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1961), 15–17.

[31] E. J. Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution (New York: New American Library, 1962), 222.

[32] Hans Rosling, “Good News at Last: The World Isn’t as Horrific as You Think,” Guardian, April 11, 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2018/apr/11/good-news-at-last-the-world-isnt-as-horrific-as-you-think; Homi Kharas and Kristofer Hamel, “A Global Tipping Point: Half the World Is Now Middle Class or Wealthier,” September 27, 2018, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/09/27/a-global-tipping-point-half-the-world-is-now-middle-class-or-wealthier/?utm_campaign=Brookings%20Brief&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&tm_content=66298094.

[33] John Kenneth Galbraith, The Affluent Society (New York: Mentor, 1958), 75.

[34] Robert W. July, A History of the African People (New York: Scribner, 1970), 468–71.

[35] William H. McNeill, The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 259–60; Ian Buruma, Inventing Japan: 1853–1964 (New York: Modern Library, 2004), 74.

[36] Germán Gutiérrez and Thomas Philippon, “The Failure of Free Entry,” National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2019, https://www.nber.org/papers/w26001.

[37] “Competition Is Withering on Both Sides of the Atlantic,” Economist, November 20, 2018, https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/11/20/competition-is-withering-on-both-sides-of-the-atlantic;

[38] Liz Hoffman and Jennifer Maloney, “For Many Big Businesses, 2020 Was a Surprisingly Good Year,” Wall Street Journal, December 18, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-many-big-businesses-2020-was-a-surprisingly-good-year-11608310791.

[39] Gwynn Guilford, “U.S. Inflation Accelerated to 8.5% in March, Hitting Four-Decade High,” The Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2022, https://www.wsj.com/articles/us-inflation-consumer-price-index-march-2022-11649725215.

[40] Rachel King, “More than 110,000 eating and drinking establishments closed in 2020,” Fortune, January 26, 2021, https://fortune.com/2021/01/26/restaurants-bars-closed-2020-jobs-lost-how-many-have-closed-us-covid-pandemic-stimulus-unemployment/; Ruth Simon, “Covid-19’s Toll on U.S. Business? 200,000 Extra Closures in Pandemic’s First Year,” The Wall Street Journal, April 16, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19s-toll-on-u-s-business-200-000-extra-closures-in-pandemics-first-year-11618580619.

[41] Chuck Casto, “New Poll: Only 16% of Small Biz Owners Think The Feds Are Doing A Good Job For Them,” Alignable, February 23, 2022, https://www.alignable.com/forum/new-poll-only-16-of-small-biz-owners-think-the-feds-are-doing-a (accessed April 27, 2022).

[42] Alexander W. Bartik, Marianne Bertrand, Zoë B. Cullen, Edward L. Glaeser, Michael Luca, and Christopher Stanton, “A Way Forward for Small Businesses,” Harvard Business Review, April 13, 2020, https://hbr.org/2020/04/a-way-forward-for-small-businesses.

[43] Christopher Rowland, “Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine Revenue Projected to Hit $26 Billion in 2021 with Production Surge,” Washington Post, May 4, 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/05/04/pfizer-covid-vaccine-revenue/.

[44] Theo Francis, “CEO Pay Heads for Record as Pandemic Recedes,” Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2022, https://www.wsj.com/articles/ceo-pay-heads-for-record-as-pandemic-recedes-11649008102; Hugh Son, “Wall Street bonuses climb to record $257,500 per worker last year, New York’s fiscal chief says,” CNBC, March 23, 2022, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/23/wall-street-bonuses-climb-to-record-257500-per-worker-last-year-new-yorks-fiscal-chief-says.html#:~:text=Investing%20Club-,Wall%20Street%20bonuses%20climb%20to%20record%20%24257%2C500%20per%20worker%20last,New%20York’s%20fiscal%20chief%20says&text=The%20average%20bonus%20paid%20to,to%20state%20comptroller%20Thomas%20DiNapoli.

[45] Doug Cameron, “Private Flying Takes Off, Boosting Demand for Business Jets,” Wall Street Journal, November 27, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/private-flying-takes-off-boosting-demand-for-business-jets-11638021602; Brad Littlejohn, “‘Over-Mighty Subjects: Big Tech and the Logic of Feudalism,” American Affairs 5, no. 3 (Fall 2021): https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2021/08/over-mighty-subjects-big-tech-and-the-logic-of-feudalism/; Augusta Saraiva and Alessandra Migliaccio, “Billionaires’ Wealth Surged to Record During Pandemic, Piketty Lab Says,” Bloomberg, December 7, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-07/pandemic-is-golden-age-for-billionaire-wealth-piketty-lab-says#:~:text=The%20share%20of%20global%20wealth,said%20in%20a%20report%20Tuesday.

[46] David S. G. Goodman, Class in Contemporary China (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014), 45; Central Intelligence Agency, “Country Comparison: Distribution of Family Income—GINI Index,” https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html.

[47] Thomas Piketty, Li Yang, and Gabriel Zucman, “Income Inequality Is Growing Fast in China and Making it Look More Like the US,” LSE Business Review, April 1, 2019, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2019/04/01/income-inequality-is-growing-fast-in-china-and-making-it-look-more-like-the-us/.

[48] Shannon Tiezzi, “Report: China’s 1 Percent Owns 1/3 of Wealth,” Diplomat, January 15, 2016, https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/report-chinas-1-percent-owns-13-of-wealth/.

[49] Mona Chalabi, “The World’s Wealthy: Where on Earth Are the Richest 1%?” Guardian, October 9, 2013, https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/oct/09/worlds-wealthy-where-russia-rich-list; Andrea Willige, “5 Charts That Show What Is Happening to the Middle Class around the World,” World Economic Forum, January 12, 2017, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/5-charts-which-show-what-is-happening-to-the-middle-class-around-the-world/.

[50] Eurofound, “Social Mobility in the EU,” Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, http://www.praxis.ee/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Social-mobility-in-the-EU-2017.pdf.

[51] Stefan Wagstyl, “Germany: The Hidden Divide in Europe’s Richest Country,” Financial Times, August 17, 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/db8e0b28-7ec3-11e7-9108-edda0bcbc928.

[52] David Goodhart, The Road to Somewhere: The New Tribes Shaping British Politics (London: Penguin, 2017), 149–51, 183.

[53] Yvonne Roberts, “Millennials Are Struggling: Is It the Fault of the Baby Boomers?” Guardian, April 28, 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/apr/29/millennials-struggling-is-it-fault-of-baby-boomers-intergenerational-fairness.

[54] Michael D. Carr and Emily E. Wiemers, “The Decline in Lifetime Earnings Mobility in the U.S.: Evidence from Survey-Linked Administrative Data,” Equitable Growth, September 7, 2016, https://equitablegrowth.org/working-papers/the-decline-in-lifetime-earnings-mobility-in-the-u-s-evidence-from-survey-linked-administrative-data/.

[55] Alex Rowell, “New Census Data Show Household Incomes Are Rising Again, but Share Going to Middle Class Is at Record Low,” Center for American Progress, September 12, 2017, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2017/09/12/438778/new-census-data-show-household-incomes-rising-share-going-middle-class-record-low/.

[56] Chad Stone et al., “A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, January 13, 2020, https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/a-guide-to-statistics-on-historical-trends-in-income-inequality; Floyd Norris, “As Corporate Profits Rise, Workers’ Income Declines,” New York Times, August 5, 2011, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/06/business/workers-wages-chasing-corporate-profits-off-the-charts.html.

[57] Elizabeth Elkind, “George W. Bush’s CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden Calls Trump Supporters ‘Our Taliban’ and Suggests Sending the ‘MAGA Wearing Unvaxxed’ on Planes to Afghanistan,” August 23, 2021, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9918841/Bushs-CIA-chief-compares-Trump-fans-Taliban-suggests-sending-unvaxxed-MAGA-Afghanistan.html; Stacy Mitchell, “Report: Fewer Small Businesses are Receiving Federal Relief Loans in States Dominated by Big Banks,” Institute for Local Self-Reliance, April 29, 2020, https://ilsr.org/banking-consolidation-ppp-report/; Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz, “Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Secret Loans,” Bloomberg, August 21, 2011, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-08-21/wall-street-aristocracy-got-1-2-trillion-in-fed-s-secret-loans; Gretchen Morgenson, “Banks, at Least, Had a Friend in Geithner,” New York Times, February 2, 2013, https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/business/banks-at-least-had-a-friend-in-geithner.html.

[58] “Too Much of a Good Thing,” Economist, March 26, 2016, https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/03/26/too-much-of-a-good-thing; Matej Bajgar et al., “Industry Concentration in Europe and North America,” OECD Publishing, January 2019, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/industry-concentration-in-europe-and-north-america_2ff98246-en.

[59] Steve Andriole, “Elizabeth Warren Has a Point About Technology Oligarchies,” Forbes, March 13, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveandriole/2019/03/13/does-elizabeth-warren-have-a-point-about-technology-oligarchies/?sh=3d1280665ca7.

[60] Annie Lowry, “Why Millennials Can’t Grow Up,” Atlantic, May 13, 2021, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/05/millennial-grandparents-unequal-generation/618859/; Joel Kotkin, “The End of Aspiration,” Quillette, April 10, 2019, https://quillette.com/2019/04/10/the-end-of-aspiration/; Leith van Onselen, “The Sad Death of Australian Home Ownership,” Macrobusiness, August 7, 2018, https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2018/08/sad-death-australian-home-ownership/ (accessed November 1, 2021).

[61] Elena L. Pasquini, “Land Concentration in Europe: What We Know,” Degrees of Latitude, November 28, 2017, http://www.degreesoflatitude.com/top-news/land-concentration-in-europe-what-we-know/.

[62] Gillian B. White, “Millennials Who Are Thriving Financially Have One Thing in Common,” Atlantic, July 15, 2015, https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/07/millennials-with-rich-parents/398501/; Joel Kotkin, “How America Is Reverting Back to the Feudal Age,” New York Post, December 25, 2019, https://nypost.com/2019/12/25/how-america-is-reverting-back-to-the-feudal-age/.

[63] Wojciech Kopczuk and Joseph P. Lupton, “To Leave or Not to Leave: The Distribution of Bequest Motives,” National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2005, https://www.nber.org/papers/w11767.pdf; Suzanne Woolley, “Rich Kids Are Counting On Inheritance to Pay for Retirement,” Bloomberg, June 7, 2018, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-07/rich-kids-are-counting-on-inheritance-to-pay-for-retirement.

[64] Jack Rogers, “Backlash Grows as Real Estate Giants Increase SFR Market Share,” GlobeSt.com, February 14, 2022, https://www.globest.com/2022/02/14/backlash-grows-as-real-estate-giants-increase-sfr-market-share/?kw=Backlash%20Grows%20as%20Real%20Estate%20Giants%20Increase%20SFR%20Market%20Share&utm_source=email&utm_medium=enl&utm_campaign=nationalamalert&utm_content=20220214&utm_term=rem&enlcmp=nltrplt4&slreturn=20220806113818; Jeff Collins, “Millennials driving demand for single-family rentals,” The Orange County Register, January 3, 2022, https://www.ocregister.com/?returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ocregister.com%2F2022%2F01%2F03%2Fmillennials-driving-demand-for-single-family-rentals%2F%3FclearUserState%3Dtrue; Paul Bergeron, “Investors Are Buying a Record Share of US Homes,” GlobeSt.com, February 17, 2022, https://www.globest.com/2022/02/17/investors-are-buying-a-record-share-of-us-homes/.

[65] Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, 534–37.

[66] Daniel Gross, “Renting Prosperity,” Wall Street Journal, May 4, 2012, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304746604577382321021920372.

[67] Jane Chung, “Big Tech, Big Cash: Washington’s New Power Players,” Public Citizen, March 24, 2021, https://www.citizen.org/article/big-tech-lobbying-update/.

[68] Andrew Perez and Tim Zelina, “Facebook, Google, Amazon Are Ramping Up Their Secretive Influence Campaigns in D.C.,” Fast Company, October 31, 2019, https://www.fastcompany.com/90424503/facebook-google-amazon-are-ramping-up-their-secretive-influence-campaigns-in-dc.

[69] Max Weber, Economy and Society, vol. 1 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), xcviii; Marc Bloch, Feudal Society, 345.

[70] Michael Lind, “The New National American Elite,” Tablet, January 19, 2021, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/new-national-american-elite; Fraser Myers, “The New Few,” Spiked, November 17, 2020, https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/11/17/the-new-few/.

[71] “TED: The Economics Daily,” March 3, 2016, https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/employment-by-industry-1910-and-2015.htm.

[72] Janet Adamy and Paul Overberg, “Doctors, Once GOP Stalwarts, Now More Likely to Be Democrats.” The Wall Street Journal, October 6, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/doctors-once-gop-stalwarts-now-more-likely-to-be-democrats-11570383523.

[73] Kimberly A. Strassel, “The Partisan Bureaucracy,” Wall Street Journal, June 10, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-partisan-bureaucracy-11623362896; Ashe Schow, “462 Financial Journalists Were Asked Their Political Leanings. Guess How Many Said They Were Conservative,” November 13, 2018, https://www.dailywire.com/news/462-financial-journalists-were-asked-their-ashe-schow; Maria Biery, “Liberal Bias Starts Long Before College,” American Conservative,July 6, 2017, https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/liberal-bias-starts-long-before-college/.

[74] Yascha Mounk, People versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save it (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018), 59, 91.

[75] Christophe Guilluy, Twilight of the Elites: Prosperity, the Periphery, and the Future of France (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016), 2, 9.

[76] Soo Rin Kim and Libby Cathey, “Obama-Era Officials Return to White House Worth Millions,” ABC News, March 21, 2021, https://abcnews.go.com/US/obama-era-officials-return-white-house-worth-millions/story?id=76582015; Billy House and Anna Edgerton, “Pelosi’s Husband Locked In $5.3 Million from Alphabet Options,” Bloomberg, July 7, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-07/pelosi-s-husband-locked-in-5-3-million-from-alphabet-options; David Bromwich, “Have Democrats Become the Party of the Rich?,” Nation, August 20, 2021, https://www.thenation.com/article/society/democrats-rich-party-obama/.

[77] Amory Gethin, Clara Martínez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty, “Brahmin Left Versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies,” 1948–2020,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 137, no. 1 (February 2022): 1–48.

[78] Charles Murray, Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960–2010 (New York: Crown Books, 2012), 19–20; Michael Lind, “The New Class War,” American Affairs 1, no. 2 (Summer 2017): https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/05/new-class-war/; Marge Anderson, “The Clergy and the Nobility,” Big Site of History, June 9, 008, https://bigsiteofhistory.com/the-clergy-and-the-nobility-the-french-revolution/.

[79] Sissi Cao and Jordan Zakarin, “Big Tech and CEOs Poured Millions Into The Election. Here’s Who They Supported,” Observer, November 2, 2020, https://observer.com/2020/11/big-tech-2020-presidential-election-donation-breakdown-ranking/; Gara LaMarche, “Is Philanthropy Bad for Democracy?,” Atlantic, October 30, 2014, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/is-philanthropy-good-for-democracy/381996/.

[80] Olivia Chan, “COVID-19 Is a Wake-Up Call for Public Health Preparedness in the Climate Crisis,” The Century Foundation, April 22, 2020, https://tcf.org/content/commentary/covid-19-wake-call-public-health-preparedness-climate-crisis/?agreed=1; Allana Akhtar, “The 15 Biggest Private Donations to Universities by the Ultra Rich,” Business Insider, May 21, 2019, https://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-private-donations-to-universities-by-individuals-2019-5.

[81] Spencer Walrath, “Rockefellers Use New Front Group to Advance Climate Liability Campaign,” Energy In Depth, September 28, 2018, https://eidclimate.org/rockefellers-use-new-front-group-to-advance-climate-liability-campaign/; Rupert Darwall, “Democrats’ Dark Money and the Climate Industrial Complex,” Washington Examiner, May 18, 2018, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/hillary-clinton?source=%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2Fdemocrats-dark-money-and-the-climate-industrial-complex; Sophie Alexander, Szu Yu Chen, and Shera Avi-Yonah, “MacKenzie Scott’s Money Bombs Are Single Handedly Reshaping America,” Bloomberg, August 12, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-mackenzie-scott-donations/; David Friedman and Jennifer Hernandez, California Environmental Quality Act, Greenhouse Gas Regulation, and Climate Change, Chapman University Center for Demographics and Policy, 2015, https://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/_files/ghg-fn.pdf; David Callahan, Fortunes of Change: The Rise of the Liberal Rich and the Remaking of America (New York: Wiley, 2010), 57–82; Rupert Darwall, “A Veneer of Certainty Stoking Climate Alarm,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, November 28, 2017, https://cei.org/content/stoking-climate-action.

[82] Naomi O’Leary, “Spectre of ‘Gilet Jaunes’ Backlash Haunts EU Climate Plans,” Irish Times, July 21, 2021, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/spectre-of-gilet-jaunes-backlash-haunts-eu-climate-plans-1.4620681; Emma Beswick, “‘Gilets Jaunes’: Which Other Countries Has the French Protest Movement Spread to?” Euronews, May 12, 2018, https://www.euronews.com/2018/12/05/gilets-jaunes-which-other-countries-has-the-french-protest-movement-spread-to; Michael Lind, “Joe Biden’s German Green Deal,” Tablet, May 2, 2021, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/joe-biden-german-green-deal-infrastructure-michael-lind; Derek Scally, “Traffic Brought to Standstill in German Cities as Protesters Increase Demands,” Irish Times, September 16, 2000, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/traffic-brought-to-standstill-in-german-cities-as-protesters-increase-demands-1.1103417; Farnaz Fassihi, “Protests Incited by Gas Price Hike Grip Iran,” New York Times, November 16, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/16/world/middleeast/iran-gas-price.html.

[83] John Hinderaker, “Exposing the Real Costs of ‘Green’ Energy,” Power Line, March 12, 2019, https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/03/exposing-the-real-costs-of-green-energy.php.

[84] Bradley Devlin, “UN Climate Envoy Bloomberg’s Private Jets Emitted More Than 500 Times the Carbon Footprint of a Typical Car,” Daily Caller, February 5, 2021, https://dailycaller.com/2021/02/05/michael-bloomberg-climate-change-emissions-private-jets-united; Rebecca Ratcliffe, “Record Private Jet Flights into Davos as Leaders Arrive for Climate Talk,” Guardian, January 22, 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/jan/22/record-private-jet-flights-davos-leaders-climate-talk; Jay Peters, “Jeff Bezos Commits $10 Billion to Fight Climate Change,” The Verge, February 17, 2020, https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/17/21141132/jeff-bezos-earth-fund-ten-billion-climate-change.

[85] Sam Schechner, “Amazon and Other Tech Giants Race to Buy Up Renewable Energy,” Wall Street Journal, June 23, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-and-other-tech-giants-race-to-buy-up-renewable-energy-11624438894; Justin Scheck, Eliot Brown, and Ben Foldy, “Environmental Investing Frenzy Stretches Meaning of ‘Green,’” Wall Street Journal, June 24, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/environmental-investing-frenzy-stretches-meaning-of-green-11624554045; Jefim Vogel et al., “Socio-Economic Conditions for Satisfying Human Needs at Low Energy Use: An International Analysis of Social Provisioning,” Science Direct 69 (July 2021): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378021000662; Jeffrey Sachs, “Climate Change Is about Greed: It’s Time for Big Oil to Pay Us Back,” CNN, July 8, 2021, https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/08/opinions/biden-climate-corporate-greed-infrastructure-sachs/index.html.

[86] Anand Giridharadas, Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World (New York: Knopf, 2018), 7.

[87] Paul Caron, “Lawyer Presidential Campaign Contributions: 97% to Clinton, 3% to Trump,” TaxProf (blog), January 20, 2017, http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2017/01/lawyer-presidential-campaign-contributions-97-to-clinton-3-to-trump.html; Andy Kiersz and Hunter Walker, “These Charts Show the Political Bias of Workers in Each Profession,” Business Insider, November 3, 2014, https://amp.businessinsider.com/charts-show-the-political-bias-of-each-profession-2014-11?__twitter_impression=true; Walter Russell Mead, “Is Meritocracy A Sham?” American Interest, July 1, 2012, https://www.the-american-interest.com/2012/07/01/is-meritocracy-a-sham/; Irving Kristol, “Is Technology a Threat to Liberal Society?” Public Interest, Spring 2001, https://www.nationalaffairs.com/storage/app/uploads/public/58e/1a4/fad/58e1a4fad2bd7881345590.pdf.

[88] James Heartfield, Green Capitalism: Manufacturing Scarcity in an Age of Abundance (London: Mute, 2008), 21–22.

[89] Matthew Karnitschnig, “Cologne Puts Germany’s ‘Lying Press’ on Defensive,” Politico, January 25, 2016, https://www.politico.eu/article/cologne-puts-germany-lying-media-press-on-defensive-migration-refugees-attacks-sex-assault-nye/; Robert Spencer, “Google Manipulates Search Results to Conceal Criticism of Islam and Jihad,” PJ Media, August 2, 2017, https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2017/08/02/google-manipulates-search-results-to-conceal-criticism-of-islam-and-jihad/; “Rome Opens Its Gates to the Modern Barbarians,” Financial Times, May 15, 2018, https://www.ft.com/content/6348cc64-5764-11e8-b8b2-d6ceb45fa9d0.

[90] Seymour Martin Lipset and Gabriel Salman Lenz, “Corruption, Culture and Markets,” in Culture Matters, ed. Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Harrington (New York: Basic Books, 2001), 119–21.

[91] Alvin Toffler, Future Shock (New York: Random House, 1970), 452.

[92] Daniel Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 478–80.

[93] Claire Cain Miller, “Americans Are Having Fewer Babies: They Told Us Why,” New York Times, July 5, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/upshot/americans-are-having-fewer-babies-they-told-us-why.html; Elizabeth Bauer, “What’s Next for the Fertility Rate? (Part 2),” Forbes, May 19, 2018, https://www.forbes.com/sites/ebauer/2018/05/19/whats-next-for-the-fertility-rate-part-2/#736c4b7a2e72; Dave Baldwin, “It Cost $31,000 More to Raise a Kid Today Than in 1960: Where’s All the Extra Money Going?” Fatherly, August 13, 2018, https://www.fatherly.com/love-money/why-cost-raising-kids-skyrocketed-since-1960/; Heidi Steinour, “Baby Bust: 5 Charts Show How Expensive It Is to Have Kids in the US Today,” The Conversation, March 28, 2018, https://theconversation.com/baby-bust-5-charts-show-how-expensive-it-is-to-have-kids-in-the-us-today-91532; Lauren Alix Brown, “When Will America Wise Up to the Truth about Why Women Aren’t Having Children?” Quartz, July 7, 2018, https://qz.com/1323241/young-americans-arent-having-children-for-a-variety-of-reasons-beyond-the-economy/.

[94] Chad Day, “Americans Have Shifted Dramatically on What Values Matter Most,” Wall Street Journal, August 25, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-have-shifted-dramatically-on-what-values-matter-most-11566738001.

[95] Tova Cohen, “Israel Has the Highest Birth Rate in the Developed World, and That’s Becoming a Problem,” Business Insider, September 25, 2015, https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-has-the-highest-birth-rate-in-the-developed-world-and-thats-becoming-a-problem-2015-9; Richard V. Reeves, Dream Hoarders: How the American Upper Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else in the Dust, Why That Is a Problem, and What to Do About It (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2018), 28; John Hopkins University, “Educated Women Increasingly Likely to Have 1st Baby before Marriage,” Medical Xpress, September 6, 2021, https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-09-women-increasingly-1st-baby-marriage.html.

[96] Alvin Toffler, Future Shock (New York: Random House, 1970), 238–51.

[97] Laura Spinney, “Why Declining Birth Rates are Good News for Life on Earth,” Guardian, July 8, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/08/why-declining-birth-rates-are-good-news-for-life-on-earth.

[98] Lyman Stone, “The Decline of American Motherhood,” Atlantic, May 13, 2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/05/mothers-day-decline-motherhood/560198/; Nicholas H. Wolfinger, “Is the Sex Recession Turning into a Great Sex Depression?” Institute for Family Studies, March 24, 2021, https://ifstudies.org/blog/is-the-sex-recession-turning-into-a-great-sex-depression.

[99] Md. Asad Ullah et al., “Potential Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Future Birth Rate,” Frontiers in Public Health 8 (December 2020), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758229/; Erin Donnelly, “As Climate Anxiety Builds, “These Women Are Choosing to Not Have Children,” Yahoo! Life, April 21, 2021, https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/women-not-having-kids-climate-change-concerns-135015534.html.

[100] Jacqueline Howard, “The Costs of Childcare around the World,” CNN, April 25, 2018, https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/25/health/child-care-parenting-explainer-intl/index.html; Charlie Weston, “Cost of Raising a Child from Birth to College is €100,000,” Independent, July 17, 2015, https://www.independent.ie/life/family/cost-of-raising-a-child-from-birth-to-college-is-100000-31383511.html.

[101] Jennifer A. Holland, “Love, Marriage, Then the Baby Carriage? Marriage Timing and Childbearing in Sweden,” Demographic Research, 29, art. 11 (August 2013): 275–306, https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol29/11/29-11.pdf; Andrew Cherlin, “Marriage Has Become a Trophy,” Atlantic, March 20, 2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/03/incredible-everlasting-institution-marriage/555320/.

[102] Sarah Knapton, “Soaring House Prices Reduce Number of Babies Born in England,” Telegraph, April 12, 2017, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/04/12/soaring-house-prices-reduce-number-babies-born-england/; Sarah O’Grady, “British Birth Rate at Record Low and Women Opt Out Raising a Family,” Daily Express, November 25, 2017, https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/884120/office-national-statistics-ons-united-kingdom-birth-rate-women-family-children.

[103] Eric Klinenberg, Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone (New York: Penguin, 2012).

[104] “The Feminine Mystique,” encyclopedia.com, https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/culture-magazines/feminine-mystique; Joshua Rhett Miller, “BLM Site Removes Page on ‘Nuclear Family Structure’ amid NFL Vet’s Criticism.” New York Post, September 24, 2020, https://nypost.com/2020/09/24/blm-removes-website-language-blasting-nuclear-family-structure/; “Lina Gordon Quotes and Sayings—Page 1,” inspiringquotes.us, https://www.inspiringquotes.us/author/1006-linda-gordon.

[105] Roger Sollenberger, “‘Hillbilly Elegy’ Author Faces Backlash over Remarks Connecting Nationalism to Fertility Rate,” November 2, 2020, https://www.salon.com/2020/11/02/hillbilly-elegy-author-faces-backlash-over-remarks-connecting-nationalism-to-fertility-rate/.

[106] Adedayo Akala, “Why America Is Moving: Money, Space, Family, Lifestyle . . . ,” NPR, March 14, 2021, https://www.npr.org/2021/03/14/975826704/why-america-is-moving-money-space-family-lifestyle.

[107] Robert Bruegmann, “The Anti-Suburban Crusade,” in Infinite Suburbia, ed.Alan Berger and Joel Kotkin (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2018), 27–36.

[108] Elise Gould and Melat Kassa, “Low-Wage, Low-Hours Workers Were Hit Hardest in the COVID-19 Recession,” Economic Policy Institute, May 20, 2021, https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-2020-employment-report/; Brad Polumbo, “New Harvard Data (Accidentally) Reveal How Lockdowns Crushed the Working Class While Leaving Elites Unscathed,” Foundation for Economic Education, June 17, 2021, https://fee.org/articles/new-harvard-data-accidentally-reveal-how-lockdowns-crushed-the-working-class-while-leaving-elites-unscathed/.

[109] Odeta Kushi, “Homeownership Remains Strongly Linked to Wealth-Building,” First American (blog), November 5, 2020, https://blog.firstam.com/economics/homeownership-remains-strongly-linked-to-wealth-building.

[110] Abigail Shrier, “To Be Young and Pessimistic in America,” Wall Street Journal, May 14, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/to-be-young-and-pessimistic-in-america-11621019488.

[111] Elizabeth Arias et al., “Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2020,” Vital Statistics Rapid Release, Report no. 15, Center for Disease Control, July 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr015-508.pdf; Isaac Schorr, “Overdose Deaths Surged to Record High during COVID Lockdown,” National Review, July 14, 2021, https://www.nationalreview.com/news/overdose-deaths-surged-to-record-high-during-covid-lockdown/; Anne Case and Angus Deaton, “Life Expectancy in Adulthood is Falling for Those without a BA Degree, but as Educational Gaps Have Widened, Racial Gaps Have Narrowed,” PNAS, 118, no. 11 (March 2021): https://www.pnas.org/content/118/11/e2024777118; Mark É. Czeisler et al., “Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, June 24–30, 2020,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69, no. 32, Center for Disease Control, August 14, 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6932a1-H.pdf.

[112] Dan Kopf, “The Rich in the US Are Adding More Years to Their Life Than the Poor,” Quartz, July 23, 2020, https://qz.com/1882206/the-rich-are-adding-more-years-to-their-life-than-the-poor-in-the-us/.

[113] Garance Franke-Ruta, “Robert Putnam: Class Now Trumps Race as the Great Divide in America,” Atlantic, June 30, 2012, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/06/robert-putnam-class-now-trumps-race-as-the-great-divide-in-america/259256/.

[114] Ben Werschkul, “The Billionaires Cutting Huge Checks for the 2022 Midterms,” Yahoo!, April 18, 2022, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-billionaires-cutting-huge-checks-for-the-2022-midterms-213356711.html.

[115] David Goldman, “Obama’s Not as Tough on Mergers as You Think,” CNN Money, April 8, 2016, https://money.cnn.com/2016/04/08/news/obama-mergers-antitrust/index.html; Ryan Cooper, “Somewhere in Between: The Rise and Fall of Clintonism,” Nation, February 14, 2018, https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-rise-and-fall-of-clintonism/.

[116] Thomas Frank, “We Need to Reclaim Populism from the Right: It Has a Long, Proud Leftwing History,” Guardian, September 12, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/12/we-need-to-reclaim-populism-from-the-right-it-has-a-long-proud-leftwing-history.

[117] Paul Embery, Despised: Why the Modern Left Loathes the Working Class (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020), 3, 8, 28, 95.

[118] Salon Talks, Salon, May 30, 2017, https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=10154882188966519&ref=watch_permalink; Matthew Sheffield, “Bill Kristol, Donald Trump and the ‘One Weird Trick’ That Overturned American Politics,” Salon, February 10, 2017, https://www.salon.com/2017/02/10/bill-kristol-donald-trump-and-the-one-weird-trick-that-overturned-american-politics/.

[119] Catherine Liu, “How Liberal Elites Use Race to Keep Workers Divided—And Justify Class-Based Inequities,” Quillette, May 20, 2021, https://quillette.com/2021/05/20/how-liberal-elites-use-race-to-keep-workers-divided-and-justify-class-based-inequities/; Sean Cooper, “Is Warren Buffett the Wallet Behind Black Lives Matter?” October 6, 2020, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/warren-buffett-black-lives-matter; Alexis C. Madrigal, “When the Nerds Go Marching In,” Atlantic, November 16, 2012, https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/; Greg Ferenstein, “How Silicon Valley is Overhauling the Democratic Party (in 9 Charts),” Business Insider, November 12, 2015, https://www.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-overhauling-democratic-party-2015-11?op=1; John Hinderaker, “It’s Official: Google Is a Democratic Party Front,” Power Line (blog), September 12, 2018, https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/its-official-google-is-a-democratic-party-front.php; Cecilia Kang and Juliet Eilperin, “Why Silicon Valley is the new revolving door for Obama staffers,” Washington Post, February 28, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-obama-nears-close-of-his-tenure-commitment-to-silicon-valley-is-clear/2015/02/27/3bee8088-bc8e-11e4-bdfa-b8e8f594e6ee_story.html.

[120] Robert D. Atkinson and Michael Lind, “Small Business Boards: A Proposal to Raise Productivity and Wages in All 50 States and the District of Columbia,” Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, April 5, 2021, https://itif.org/publications/2021/04/05/small-business-boards-proposal-raise-productivity-and-wages-all-50-states.

[121] Lydia Saad, “Confidence in Big Business, Big Tech Wanes Among Republicans,” Gallup, July 18, 2021, https://news.gallup.com/poll/352484/confidence-big-business-big-tech-wanes-among-republicans.aspx.

[122] Justin Baer, “Florida’s Approval of $15 Minimum Wage Sets Up Battle in Other States,” Wall Street Journal, November 27, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/floridas-approval-of-15-minimum-wage-sets-up-battle-in-other-states-11606482001.

[123] Stephen Hawkins, Daniel Yudkin, Míriam Juan-Torres, Tim Dixon, “Tribes: A Study of America’s Polarized Landscape,” More In Common, 2018, https://hiddentribes.us/media/qfpekz4g/hidden_tribes_report.pdf; Yashca Mounk, “Americans Strongly Dislike PC Culture,” Atlantic, October 10, 2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/large-majorities-dislike-political-correctness/572581/.

[124] Mark Moore, “Majority of Americans Hate Socialism, Reject AOC: Survey,” New York Post, December 24, 2020, https://nypost.com/2020/12/24/socialism-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-get-low-marks-in-national-survey/.

[125] Ron Fournier and Sophie Quinton, “How Americans Lost Trust in Our Greatest Institutions,” Atlantic, April 20, 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/04/how-americans-lost-trust-in-our-greatest-institutions/256163/.

[126] Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the 16th Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974), 357.

[127] Adam Tooze, “After Escape: The New Climate Power Politics,” e-flux Journal, no. 4, December 2020, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/114/367062/after-escape-the-new-climate-power-politics/.